Archive for the ‘Science’ Category
by Thomas E. Brewton
From an intellectual viewpoint, there is no inherent conflict between religion and science. Trouble comes from the efforts of atheistic materialists to hijack science.
As noted in Science vs Religion, religion is obviously no impediment to scientific study of the natural world. All of the 17th century's groundbreaking discoveries and applications of mathematics to the natural world were the work of devout Christians. In only one case– Galileo – was there conflict with the church, and that was primarily a political matter.
Galileo's fight with the Church was not solely the result of his heliocentric theories. One of his personal friends, the local bishop, had supported publication of Galileo’s scientific work. But, after his friend became Pope, Galileo published a satirical work in which some church doctrine was presented as foolish. It was one thing to publish scientific papers, quite another to ridicule the Pope and the Church during the Reformation's spiritual and political warfare.
Religion looks at the big picture, science at particular natural instances. Mathematics is a bridge between the two: applicable to particulars, but drawing its theorems from extrapolations into the immateriality of mental constructs, as did Plato with his paradigm of Ideal Forms.
In the 17th century, when natural science emerged as a new paradigm, religion and science were understood to be equally valid ways to study God's creation. The laws of mathematics and natural science had, after all, been created by God as part of the whole universe.
The emerging paradigm of scientific experimentation was not conceived by seminal thinkers like Francis Bacon as replacing religion and classical philosophy. The physical sciences were, instead, to be a supplemental method to determine the nature of the physical world.
More evidence continues to show the fallacy of the "Global Warming" myth and that the "global Warming" scare is just a tactic to control our freedom and economics through increasing negative legislation.
WASHINGTON — The past two years have seen a flood of news reports about global warming, largely concentrating on melting ice caps, hurricanes and mass extinctions. A new study by the Cato Institute examines these stories and shows that many of them, including scientific reports, are remarkably flawed.
In the Policy Analysis "Is the Sky Really Falling?: A Review of Recent Global Warming Scare Stories," Patrick J. Michaels, a Cato senior fellow in environmental studies, argues that many stories about hurricanes, the melting of polar ice and extinctions "are riddled with self-inconsistencies, are inconsistent with other findings, and are reported — as much by scientists themselves as by reporters — in extreme or misleading fashions that do not accurately portray the actual research."
Once a commonly-exceeded temperature threshold is reached, there is no relationship between observed hurricane severity and ocean-surface temperatures, writes Michaels. Actually, the frequency of intense and extreme hurricanes in both the Atlantic and the Western Pacific (the most active regions on earth) was the same in the 1940s and 50s as in the mid-1990s.
"Reports of rapid disintegration of Greenland's ice ignore the fact that the region was warmer than it is now for several decades in the early 20th century, before humans could have had much influence on climate," the paper points out. Furthermore, Antarctica is gaining, not losing ice, and that is predicted to continue for at least the next 100 years by all modern models.
Stories about mass species extinction rates as a result of global warming turn out to be demonstrably wrong, as well. According to Michaels, reports about extinctions of butterfly populations in Europe ignore the fact that warming has increased the geographic range of most species, resulting in more, not less, biodiversity.
This collection of half-truths and misstatements about global warming are "a predictable consequence of the way that science is now conducted, where issues compete with each other for public support," Michaels concludes. "Unfortunately, this creates a culture of negativity that is reflected in the recent spate of global warming reports."