What is the real reason for all the recent "Religion of Peace" violence directed to the non-Muslim world over the publication of a few editorial cartoons?
Palestine has been publishing similar anti-Israel cartoons with no world anti-Muslim riots erupting anywhere in the world.
An Egyptian magazine published the same Danish cartoon causing all the uproar, in a Islamic publication last October with no violent reaction from the Muslim world.
Ann Coulter, in a recent column in World Net Daily, has pointed out that the rule forbidding the drawing of Mohammed is only a recent idea.
The rioting Muslims claim they are upset because Islam prohibits any depictions of Muhammad – though the text is ambiguous on beheadings, suicide bombings and flying planes into skyscrapers.
The belief that Islam forbids portrayals of Muhammad is recently acquired. Back when Muslims created things, rather than blowing them up, they made paintings, frescoes, miniatures and prints of Muhammad.
But apparently the Quran is like the Constitution: It’s a "living document," capable of sprouting all-new provisions at will. Muslims ought to start claiming the Quran also prohibits indoor plumbing, to explain their lack of it.
Other interpretations of the Quran forbid images of humans or animals, which makes even a child’s coloring book blasphemous. That’s why the Taliban blew up those priceless Buddhist statues, bless their innocent, peace-loving little hearts.
So why all the fuss? There was no fuss when an Islamic publication in Egypt published the articles four months ago.
Obviously there is a hidden Muslim agenda involved.