There is good news and hope of a positive resolution on the eminent domain case, Kelo v. City of New London. This case was definitely over stepping by the U.S. Courts over the Constitutional right of property ownership and protection:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. IV Amendment, U.S. Constitution
On November 3. 2005, H.R. 4128 was passed in the House Of Representatives by an overwhelming majority vote of 376-38. The Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2005 will protect home owners, churches and all property owners from losing their property in the name of commercial development, as it was in the Kelo v. City of New London court decision.
This bill provides fines and sanctions against states who do not follow the bill’s definition of what constitutes land to be taken by eminent domain. The Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2005 defines what land can be taken by eminent domain and taken can not be used for commercial purposes. Fines and sanctions can be levied at any state not following the law.
We can only hope that the federal activist courts will keep their hand off.